Many founders see outcome-based pricing as a powerful wedge to win deals. It sounds simple because there’s obvious alignment as one is paying for results. The perceived risk is lower, so getting to yes should be easier.
But that idea hides a paradox and a deeper reality in that it assumes pricing is the problem. But pricing isn’t the real problem. The real constraint is how the buyer’s business is built.
Where the Misunderstanding Begins
Inside most companies, outcomes are messy. They are hard to define, hard to measure, and hard to agree on. Data lives in different places and teams see things differently. Finance wants steady, predictable costs. They don’t want invoices that change based on performance. Outcome pricing brings uncertainty into a system that was built to avoid it. What feels like alignment to a founder can feel like risk to a buyer. Hard won internal alignment is being removed.
That’s why a quiet comment from Salesforce matters. When CFO Robin Washington said seats are still growing on a recent earning call, she wasn’t rejecting new ideas. She was pointing to reality. Seats work because they fit how companies already operate. People have roles, roles have budgets, and budgets get approved by teams built around certainty. Seats match that structure.
There’s another layer most people miss. Seat growth is not just about pricing. It shows how deep your product goes inside a company.
Each new seat means:
- Another team using you
- Another workflow running through you
- Another decision shaped by your system
Over time, this is how software becomes part of the company. Software isn’t just a tool, it’s something the business depends on.
This is where outcome pricing starts to break down. It assumes the vendor owns the result, but you can’t own a result unless you control it.
Most SaaS Companies Don’t Own Their Customer’s Outcome
They influence results and sometimes they matter a lot. But they don’t control what happens before or after their product is used. So, they try to price on outcomes they can’t fully control, for buyers who can’t fully measure them, inside companies that don’t want changing costs. The friction that shows up isn’t a sales issue. It’s a mismatch in structure.
The companies that make outcome pricing work take a different path. They don’t start with outcomes. They start by expanding their reach inside the customer.
They add seats.
They spread across teams.
They capture more workflows.
Over time, they shape how work gets done. They gain more control, and only then can they price on outcomes, because now the outcome comes from a system they largely run.
This is the shift from builder to architect.
A builder asks:
“What’s the best pricing model?”
An architect asks:
“What has to be true for our client and ourselves for this to work?”
Pricing is not just about money. It shows where control lives.
Flawed Thinking
There’s also a common mistake in how founders think about this. They believe outcome pricing makes deals easier.
But strong buyers often see the opposite
- They see unclear costs
- They see unclear responsibility
- They wonder if the vendor really understands their business
What feels like alignment to a founder and the startup team can feel like risk to an enterprise client.
So, seats keep growing. Not because the market lacks new ideas, but because seats fit how companies are built today. Institutional success demands clear roles, clear budgets, and clear decisions rooted in responsibility and control. New pricing models are being added on top of this. They are not replacing it.
If you zoom out, the real shift isn’t from seats to outcomes. It’s from tools to operating systems.
Tools help people do work and they charge per user. Operating systems shape how work gets done and they can charge for results.
A Deeper Understanding
But becoming an operating system is not about pricing, it’s about design.
The better question for a founder is not:
“Should we use outcome pricing?”
Instead, it’s:
“Where do we control enough of the system to earn it?”
And it’s also:
“What would need to change for that to be true?”
Until you can answer that, pricing will feel like the lever to pull.
But it isn’t. Structure is.
Why Seats Still Win in SaaS
Most founders believe outcome-based pricing is the future.
Pay for results, align incentives, and get to an easier yes.
But enterprise companies aren’t built to buy that way.
Budgets are tied to roles and costs need to be predictable.
Outcomes are messy to define and harder to measure.
That’s why seats keep growing.
Not because they’re better, but because they fit how businesses operate.
Here’s what doesn’t get discuss thoughtfully enough.
Outcome pricing only works when you control the system that produces the outcome.
Most don’t.
So, this isn’t a pricing problem.
It’s a structure problem.
See this week’s newsletter for more